The law divided the people into three types regardless of social status or occupation but most taxes were still based on land. People who were proprietors of land assessed as worth £2 or forty shillings were classed as ‘substantial’ and were required to pay a rate to support the poor. They also had to pay rates to maintain roads and varies tithes. |
The Substantial people were sometimes called ‘forty shilling freeholders’ but this is a rather confusing term because they may not have been ‘freeholders’ in the modern sense of the word. Frequently they only held leases on the land. Another point of confusion is that they may have been something else other than farmers. The earl Waldegrave and other significant landowners like the Kingsmills had to pay the poor rates. |
The substantial people would elect one or more members to collect the rates and make the payments to those who deserved it. These people were called Overseers. |
The second main group were the poor or paupers. Modern sensitivities would call them ‘claimants’ or ‘recipients’ but theses were not the historical terms. |
There were several classes of poor. The deserving poor were given financial support or benefit in kind like sacks of coal for heating or potatoes for planting. Those who could work were made to work and ‘sturdy beggars’ could be whipped out of the village. |
Poor children were sent to work as ‘apprentices’ paid for by th parish. Some may have learnt useful trades but many were just used as subsidised labourers. Samuel Blanning may have risen from poor apprentice to a substantial person. |
An even less politically correct term used were link to bastardry cases. illegitimacy was a social stigma and practical problem which the parish had to pay for unless the father of the child could be found who was then responsible An alternative to ‘bastard’ was ‘base born’. A significant percentage of the apprentices paid for by Chewton Mendip parish were illegitimate. |
An act passed in 1662 was supposed to resolve who paid for th deserving poor based on the right of settlement. It was the responsibility of the parish where the person as born to support them so people were ‘removed‘ from the place where they were found and returned to their place of origin. This law resulted in a large number of court cases were the right of settlement was examined and a large industry of transportation. People were put into carts and transported like animals to market. The examinations and resulting removal orders provide a rich source of family history data. |
The majority of the village fell between the substantial and poor groups. They had to work hard to support themselves and their families. |
One reason why people required support was because the became ill. The Chewton Mendip poor law records are full of cases of people getting ill or injured and either dieing or recovering. There are references to people being inoculated against small pox which is unusual. |
There are some cases of people being punished or where the parish had to pay for people to be taken to jail. One of the Hippisleys was a notable example of an expensive culprit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|